Bill Blaikie, MP
Visit Bill's Leadership Website
NDP
Home Page
About Bill
Winnipeg-Transcona
On the Issues
Emergency Workers
International Trade
Terrorism & Security
House Leader's Corner
Justice
Intergovernmental Affairs
The Environment
Private Member's Motions
Foreign Affairs
Archives
House of Commons
Links
Contact Bill
General
ndp.ca
Random Links
United Transportation Union
corner
corner
Anti-terrorism Legislation and the Charter of Rights

The Following is a question asked of the Prime Minister about possible conflicts between the new Liberal Anti-terrorist Legislation and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms brought in when the Prime Minister was Justice Minister in the government of Pierre Trudeau.

 

 

 

 

Anti-terrorism Legislation

Tuesday October 16, 2001

 

Mr. Bill Blaikie (Winnipeg--Transcona, NDP): Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister has just mentioned the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. I know how attached he is to it because I was here in the years when he made the case for it in the House of Commons.

    Given the appropriate attachment of the government to the charter and given the controversy about whether or not the bill actually meets the test of the charter, would the government consider a referral to the supreme court of the more controversial elements of the bill so that the court might consider it simultaneously? We could still do this in the urgent way that the government considers necessary.

    Hon. Anne McLellan (Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, as the Prime Minister has just indicated, we believe the legislation fully complies with the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Therefore we see no reason to refer this matter to the supreme court.

    Mr. Bill Blaikie (Winnipeg--Transcona, NDP): Mr. Speaker, the problem is that other people may think differently and it may be in the government's interest to prove that it does meet that test by referring in the way that I have suggested.

    Would the Prime Minister indicate whether he would be open to sunsetting, as has been suggested, certain sections of the bill?

    I would agree with him that some sections having to do with UN conventions are not things that should be sunsetted but there may be more controversial elements that could be sunsetted. I wonder whether the government would be open to that.

    Right Hon. Jean Chrétien (Prime Minister, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I think there is a place to make this debate. We have a committee that will meet very soon and it will look at all that. I want the members to look at that.

    I want to affirm again that, yes, rather than rushing into this legislation we took our time because we had a goal. We wanted to have a bill against terrorism that would not work against the charter of rights and freedoms. I wanted the charter of rights and freedoms to remain completely intact despite the legislation.



corner
Print This Article
Related
  • Conservative Party and Anti-terrorism Legislation - Statement in the House of Commons
  • Bill Blaikie's Speech on Bill C-36 at Report Stage
  • C-36 Amendments - Question to Minister - Nov. 20
  • Government Amendments to C-36 Question to Minister, Nov. 20
  • C-36 and G-20 Protest in Ottawa-Question Nov. 19
  • Anti-terrorism Legislation Question to Minister - Oct. 22
  • Bill Blaikie on The Nation's Business (CBC Public Affiars Program)
  • Anti-terrorism Legislation - First Reading
  • Speech - Bill C-36 at 2nd Reading
  • Anti-terrorism Legislation Question - Nov. 5
    More

  • Recent Postings
  • Bill Blaikie's letter to Solicitor General about Canadian detained in U.S. without charges.
  • Cell phones - Criminal Code
  • Farm Aid Package - Trade Dispute
  • National Aboriginal Day - Statement in the House of Commons
  • National Drinking Water Standards - Walkerton Report
  • Canadian Flag
    Design by OpenConcept Consulting
    Parliament Hill Address: 214 West Block, House of Commons, Ottawa, ON K1A 0A6
    Phone: (613) 995-6339, Fax: (613) 995-6688

    Maintained by Union Labour